top of page

Takeaways from "Neurodivergence in Dogs" Topic Chat

Our vibrant community holds a commitment to fostering an inclusive learning environment, guided by learner-centered principles. In a recent topic chat exploring "Neurodivergence in Dogs," our members delved into profound discussions, emphasizing the impact of individualized approaches. Let's embark on a thrilling journey through the key takeaways from this riveting conversation.

Defining Neurodivergence: To set the stage, we explored the concept of neurodiversity, as eloquently defined by Harvard Health Publishing. It encapsulates the idea that there is no singular "right" way of thinking, learning, or behaving. Instead, differences are celebrated, not stigmatized. This aligns seamlessly with our community's ethos of embracing diverse perspectives and adapting teaching techniques to each individual learner.

Beyond Labels: Prioritizing impact over diagnosis. While the world debates potential diagnoses for animals, our focus remained on the impact of neurodivergence. How can we empower each learner, regardless of their unique perspective? The group consensus was clear: individualization is paramount. This led to discussions on tailoring communication and adopting a collaborative approach to accommodate diverse needs.

The Power of Two-Way Communication: Central to our discourse was the recognition that effective communication is a two-way street. Members championed a shared, constructive, and collaborative approach to create opportunities for accommodating learner differences.

Accommodations in Action: As we explored the nuances of teaching animals, questions arose about the validity of blanket rules, such as the advice to avoid repeating cues. Could such rules inadvertently create conflict and misunderstandings? This became particularly poignant when considering animals with challenges like working memory.

The conversation evolved into a reflection on what it truly means to offer accommodations. We pondered the implications of standardized rules in situations where learners may need more support. For instance, in the scenario of a dog seemingly ignoring a cue, is it stubbornness, disobedience, or a need for additional support? Is it possible the dog was stressed or distracted, and was unable to intake and retain the instruction? This sparked a deeper conversation about equipping human learners with the tools to modify rules judiciously, fostering a better understanding of when and how to provide accommodations for their animal companions.

Neurodiversity Affirming Practice: An inspiring revelation emerged as we explored the intersection of neurodiversity in animal training and its impact on human-animal relationships. Engaging in neurodiversity-affirming practices not only allows clients to advocate for their animal's needs but also creates a safe space for them to voice their own. This reciprocal dynamic amplifies the connection between humans and animals, enriching the learning experience for both.

Our exploration of neurodivergence in animals illuminated the power of individualization, communication, and collaboration in fostering a harmonious learning environment. This conversation, like all of our events was rich with wisdom that we will continue to grow from as we navigate incorporating learner-centered principles into the intricate landscape of animal training.

bottom of page